Interface c# là gì

Straight of the bat I understvà that ANSI C is not an object orientated programming language. I want lớn learn how khổng lồ apply a particular oo technique using c.

Bạn đang xem: Interface c# là gì

For example, I want khổng lồ create several audio effect classes that all have the same function names but different implementations of those functions.

If I was making this in a higher màn chơi language I would first write an interface và then implement it.

AudioEffectInterface-(float) processEffect DelayClass-(float) processEffect // do delay code return resultFlangerClass-(float) processEffect // vị flanger code return result-(void) main effect= new DelayEffect() effect.process() effect = new FlangerEffect() effect.process()How can I achieve sầu such flexibility using C?


c oop
Share
Improve sầu this question
Follow
asked Jun 10 "11 at 9:59
*

dubbeatdubbeat
7,2651818 gold badges6666 silver badges115115 bronze badges
1
Add a phản hồi |

3 Answers 3


Active sầu Oldest Votes
40
There are three distinct ways you can achieve polymorphism in C:

Code it outIn the base class functions, just switch on a class type ID lớn điện thoại tư vấn the specialized versions. An incomplete code example:

typedef enum classType CLASS_A, CLASS_B classType;typedef struct base classType type; base;typedef struct A base super; ... A;typedef struct B base super; ... B;void A_construct(A* me) base_construct(&me->super); super->type = CLASS_A;int base_foo(base* me) switch(me->type) case CLASS_A: return A_foo(me); case CLASS_B: return B_foo(me); default: assert(0), abort(); Of course, this is tedious to lớn do for large classes.

Xem thêm: Địa Điểm Ăn Vặt Sài Gòn Cực Ngon Và Nổi Tiếng Đáng Thưởng Thức

Store function pointers in the objectYou can avoid the switch statements by using a function pointer for each thành viên function. Again, this is incomplete code:

typedef struct base int (*foo)(base* me); base;//class definitions for A and B as aboveint A_foo(base* me);void A_construct(A* me) base_construct(&me->super); me->super.foo = A_foo;Now, calling code may just do

base* anObject = ...;(*anObject->foo)(anObject);Alternatively, you may use a preprocessor macro along the lines of:

#define base_foo(me) (*me->foo)(me)Note that this evaluates the expression me twice, so this is really a bad idea. This may be fixed, but that"s beyond the scope of this answer.

Xem thêm: Girl Viet Nam Teen Xinh - Hot Girl Viet Nam Teen Girl Sexy Show Hang Bigo

Use a vtableSince all objects of a class share the same mix of thành viên functions, they can all use the same function pointers. This is very cchiến bại khổng lồ what C++ does under the hood:

typedef struct base_vtable int (*foo)(base* me); ... base_vtable;typedef struct base base_vtable* vtable; ... base;typedef struct A_vtable base_vtable super; ... A_vtable;//within A.cint A_foo(base* super);static A_vtable gVtable = .foo = A_foo, ...;void A_construct(A* me) base_construct(&me->super); me->super.vtable = &gVtable;;Again, this allows the user code to lớn do the dispatch (with one additional indirection):

base* anObject = ...;(*anObject->vtable->foo)(anObject);Which method you should use depends on the task at hand. The switch based approach is easy khổng lồ whip up for two or three small classes, but is unwieldy for large classes and hierarchies. The second approach scales much better, but has a lot of space overhead due lớn the duplicated function pointers. The vtable approach requires quite a bit of additional structure và introduces even more indirection (which makes the code harder to read), but is certainly the way to go for complex class hierarchies.


Chuyên mục: Blogs